What the night leaves behind
Try reconstructing a club night from whatever makes it home: a creased flyer, a cloakroom stub, a phone note containing half a track title. The room had a whole weather system. The pocket has damp paper.
On September 30, DJ Mag reported that In Clubland, a new book, chronicles 35 years of global club culture, with cameos from Daft Punk and The Chemical Brothers. Those are handsome names to have at the door. The announced scale is an enticing proposition for anyone whose musical education involved staying out too late.
I’m interested in what that scope asks of a reader. Judgment on the book itself needs a full reading. In the meantime, there is the unruly problem of turning a thousand intensely felt nights into something that fits on a shelf. Keep a pencil nearby for the unfamiliar venue names and stray records.
Fame is a useful doorway
There is nothing embarrassing about arriving for the famous names. Daft Punk and The Chemical Brothers are perfectly good reasons to be curious. Well-known artists give an unfamiliar history a point of entry. Nobody needs to pass an obscurity exam before opening a book.
Trouble starts when recognition becomes a sorting system. If every earlier room is described mainly as the place where a future star once appeared, a scene gets squeezed into the shape of a career. The people who kept dancing there after that artist moved on become scenery.
Read with a simple check: what can you learn about the room without using the headliner’s name? Look for a resident’s account of the opening hour, when the room was filling and the records had a different job. That can lead to music left out of the star’s story.
A cameo can send you hunting for a record. Let it send you sideways, too, toward another participant’s recollection or a local mix with a date attached.
Give global a street address
Thirty-five years is a span. Global is a promise about geography. Put the two together and a reader should be alert to which cities receive texture and which get a brisk wave through a taxi window.
That is a standard to bring to any sweeping club history. A venue’s position in town can explain part of who reaches it. A local shop or radio show can reveal how records circulated. A city’s name alone gives you little sense of the routes that connected its dancers to its music.
We also need room for scenes that mattered intensely to their participants without producing an internationally marketable star. A party can shape a person’s friendships and taste for years. Its claim to attention does not depend on a later documentary deal.
When a passage makes a city sound interchangeable with any other, write down what you still need to know. Start with where the crowd came from and how they found the night.
Let memory disagree
Club reminiscence has an excellent publicist: the person telling it. A clumsy transition can become a moment of inspired friction after twenty years. A miserable wait outside can disappear once the music is remembered as life-changing. Affection edits.
This is where specificity earns its keep. An interview preserves a participant’s account. A printed flyer records what was advertised. A direct recording of a DJ mixer’s output has limits, too. It cannot tell you how the bass behaved at the back wall. These sources can rub against one another without any witness being a villain.
Look for dates and clear attribution. Enjoy the stories, then notice which claims are anchored to an artifact and which come from someone’s recollection. Two accounts of the same night may describe different hours or different positions in the room.
Leave an uncertain detail uncertain. If an old mix has no reliable date, label it that way. A file’s creation date may reflect the day it was transferred. A confident caption added today can travel farther than the tentative recollection it began with.
Make a companion archive
You can do something useful with the reading before you finish the book. Pick one club, party or radio show you care about and gather a small set of traces. Keep the scope narrow enough that you can actually describe what you have.
Photograph both sides of a flyer. Keep an untouched copy of an audio file before making a listening version. Add a plain note with the event’s name, the source of the item and whatever date you can establish. Mark estimates as estimates. If the file was digitized from a cassette, preserve that information alongside it.
Then add the context the object cannot supply. Someone who remembers a resident’s warm-up might help explain the night more clearly than another isolated peak-time clip. Ask an open question about what happened around the music, and distinguish the answer from information you can confirm elsewhere.
Care matters here. Ask before sharing someone’s private photographs or identifying them in a public archive. Give photographers and recordists credit where it is known. Keep another copy somewhere separate from your everyday device. You can start with a folder and a text file, with room to correct the notes later.
Leave room for the next record
Make a small listening queue as you read. Put a familiar record next to something that only earned a passing mention. You may hear a connection the text barely discusses, or discover that your favorite thing in a chapter arrived through a side door.
Nostalgia is allowed to feel good. You can miss the club with the bad toilets and the perfect corner of bass. You can love a room you only know through somebody else’s records. An old account gets restrictive when it turns other people’s present into a lesser imitation. There should be room for the reader who was there and the reader trying to find somewhere to dance this weekend.
The appeal of a 35-year history is the number of possible routes into further listening. Keep a list of unfamiliar names with enough detail to find the source again. Leave the book open beside the speakers and queue one of them while the penciled notes are still fresh.
Written by Jude Harper
Comments
No comments yet.